Everything you wanted to know about trepanation

Selfportrait.jpg

Self-portrait
Madeline von Foerster, 2005

I’ve wanted for some time to post this evocative self-portrait by artist Madeline von Foerster, but I knew if I did, I would have to accompany it with an article about the history of trepanation. An ancient surgical procedure which involves drilling the cranium and removing small sections of bone, trepanation has both mystical and medical associations, and despite its inclusion in Phil Pullman’s popular His Dark Materials trilogy, it remains pretty obscure.

Imagine my surprise and delight when, in the timeliest of manners, the Neurophilosopher swooped in and wrote this excellent Illustrated History of Trepanation that I can simply link to! Thank you, Neurophilosophy Man! You’re my hero! (In your honor, I hereby pledge to read a large chunk of neurophilosophy in the time I would have otherwise spent Googling “trepanation”, “trephination”, and all its other variants).

Anyway – after reading all about trepanation, I highly recommend that you visit von Foerster’s website. Her intricate artwork bursts with medieval influences, symbolism, and erudition, while remaining completely delightful – and her textures, color and detail border on hedonistic. I’m not sure how many levels of meaning there are to some of her pieces, but it’s lovely to try to figure it out.

Posted in Artists & Art, Biology, Science | 5 Comments

Is this art? (part 2)

frankel.jpg

Ferrofluid
Felice Frankel

“Most people think of science as abstract and numerical. In fact, science is a surprisingly visual endeavor: both data and theory are often driven by pictures and images. Felice Frankel’s work conveys the tremendous beauty and excitement of science–letting the layperson share in the wonder of studying the natural world.”

-Eric S. Lander

Continuing yesterday’s theme, but from the art world’s side, gallery owner Edward Winkleman responds on his blog to a NYT profile of Felice Frankel. Winkleman pulls the same things from the piece that got me ruffled when I read it last night.

According to the NYT, Frankel started a stint at MIT as “artist-in-residence,” but ended there as a “research scientist.” No explanation is given for this transition, but it might have something to do with the two reasons Frankel herself disavows “artist” status. She says:

1) her work doesn’t sell, and

2) her work is not about her own ego.

Therefore, she’s not an artist. Double ouch!

Frankel apparently bases this self-assessment on her personal interactions with the professional art world, because the science world is justifiably gaga over her work. And I’m not sure why it wouldn’t be “art.” Frankel’s audio commentary on this slide show discusses the design and planning aspects of her process, and how she uses digital tools to refine her images (Frankel uses a Mac, of course.) But Frankel called her 2002 book Envisioning Science: The Design and Craft of the Science Image. Why design & craft, but not art? Simply because her pieces have a practical purpose?

Frankel says of the image at the top of this post, which appeared on the cover of Physics Today, “I’d like to think you are curious about it because of the way I photographed it. My hope is that you are going to want to ask questions about it.” (NYAS). That sounds like an artist to me. She also notes that she’s sick of it, because it has been reprinted so often. That sounds like a problem an artist would like to have. . .

More on Felice Frankel: Science & the City (gallery and podcast)

Posted in Artists & Art, Photography, Science | 1 Comment

Is this art?

art2.jpg

Interaction of Stellar Wind with Diffuse Nebulae, 1968
Bernar Venet

The traveling proprietors of Cognitive Daily, Dave and Greta Munger, check in from Paris with this formidable question: Is science art? More specifically, is an enlarged journal article, presented devoid of context, art?

Many amusing comments ensue.

Posted in Artists & Art | 4 Comments

Bodyscope 1935: Man, Woman, and a dash of dated rhetoric

bodyscope.jpg

Bodyscope Anatomical Chart, 1935
approximately 20″ x 16″
Ralph H. Segal, Bodyscope Publications Inc.,
Educational Building, 70 5th Ave., NYC

From 1935, two ornate Bodyscope teaching charts. Three windows in each chart allow a cutaway view of the torso and its accompanying legends (in the arches on either side) to rotate, providing five different views of the internal organs. A numbered key below the figure indicates which of the organ systems is currently displayed. The University of Kansas Clendening Library has a complete set of images in its collection (of the male, the female, and a third organ system chart).

Continue reading

Posted in Biology, Museum Lust, Science, Wonder Cabinets | Comments Off

Boston’s Harcourt Bindery

bindery1.jpg bindery2.jpg

I love gears, I love type, I love paper art: virtual field trip, courtesy of the Rag & Bone Blog.

Posted in Books, Destinations, Museum Lust, Retrotechnology | Comments Off

Cabinet of Monstrosities

avaritia.jpg
Avaritia/Jose
Hajime Emoto, 2005

Quick quiz: can you list the seven deadly sins?

Continue reading

Posted in Artists & Art, Wonder Cabinets | 5 Comments

Just Tired

I’ve been out of it lately, for stupid reasons that I ought to be handling better. I’m just so tired. My life has been in a state of uncertain flux for too long, and I’ve gotten way off-balance.

As I was browsing some unfamiliar blogs (great for when you’re tired but paradoxically have insomnia) this insightful post at Old English in New York grabbed me. It revisits that late-night dorm-room question: if you could live forever, would you choose to do so? Reflecting on her answer, MKH turns to the wisdom of Dr. Who.

Continue reading

Posted in Department of the Drama | 5 Comments

Here there be Seadragon

This is the sort of pretty toy I’m used to Apple giving me. Why, why is this from Microsoft? I’m confused, but I want!

Via: all over the place. Source: TED Conference.

Posted in Film, Video & Music, Science | 3 Comments

Better than the book?

018.jpg

017.jpg

from HisDarkMaterials.org

Full disclosure: I am not a fan of Philip Pullman. I didn’t love His Dark Materials; it was undeniably clever, but too heavy-handed for me to ever fully relax my guard (I don’t like being told what to think – even when I agree). Further, I didn’t appreciate Pullman whaling on C.S. Lewis in interviews (C.S. Lewis had issues, but come on, one can read Narnia without being surreptitiously brainwashed. I did).

Continue reading

Posted in Books, Film, Video & Music | 2 Comments

Hearts, to be worn on the sleeve

dourthe2.jpg
Boîtes à trésors: Anatomie series
Lyndie Dourthe

These beaded, embroidered stick pins are an odd but charming intersection of old-school anatomy with bohemian embellishment. Who doesn’t like sparkly little skulls? (Certainly not Damien Hirst.) Continue reading

Posted in Artists & Art, Frivolity | Comments Off