Wombs, Waxes and Wonder Cabinets

This essay has been reposted at the new bioephemera, Feb 19, 08.

Anatomical Teaching Model of a Pregnant Woman
Stephan Zick, 1639-1715
Wood and ivory

Kunstkammer Georg Laue is a Munich antique/art gallery informed by the sensibility of the “wonder cabinets” (kunst- or wunder-kammer) of 17th century Germany. One of the interesting objects described on the site is this ivory model of a pregnant woman with removable parts, including internal organs and a fetus.

Such dissection models may seem incongruous to modern eyes – the perfectly clean, white ivory cadaver not only has impeccably coiffed hair, a hinged arm allows her hand to rest delicately against her forehead as she reclines on a small lace-trimmed pillow! She’s clearly dead, with a little inlaid coffin for a case, but she’s more like a puzzle box than a body.

17th-18th century medical illustrations offered a variety of odd perspectives on the pregnant female form. A more clinical approach prevailed in Jan van Rymsdyk’s 18th-century illustrations for atlases by William Smellie and William Hunter. (Please be aware that if you’re not of a medical bent, you may find the illustrations below the fold unpleasant.)

Rymsdyk’s illustrations focus tightly on the gravid uterus, to the exclusion of nonessential anatomy; the cadaver’s thighs are not merely truncated, they are presented in sharply detailed cross-section, like joints of meat in a butcher’s stall.


Gravid uterus at full term
Engraving, after drawings by Jan van Rymsdyk
From The anatomy of the human gravid uterus exhibited in figures,
by William Hunter (1774)

It would be hard to arrange a more unsentimental view of the womb! Yet Rymsdyk’s glistening engravings are stylized in their own way – they’re hyperrealistic, impeccably clean, free of the gore that would obscure both dissection and birth. Rymsdyk’s motive is clarity rather than sentimentality, but his illustrations end up as starkly artificial as a bleached lace pillow.

In soft, semi-translucent colored wax, artists achieved more realistic results. Some of the best examples are Clemente Susini’s wax anatomical models, made between 1803 and 1805, which are documented in detail at the website of the University of Cagliari. The Cagliari collection includes two obstetrical models very similar to Rymsdyk’s engravings. (Wax models served as realistic, life-size teaching examples when pregnant cadavers were unavailable, and were still created as recently as the 1940s).

Susini also sculpted waxes more reminiscent of Zick’s style than Rymsdyk’s. His “Medical Venus” in the collection of La Specola at the University of Florence (Museo di storia naturale) represents a popular type of model displayed for the edification of 18th century audiences. Unlike the Cagliari models, or indeed other models in the La Specola collection, the most dramatic La Specola waxes depict entire nude bodies. The “dissection” is restricted to the trunk, which can be un-lidded to reveal removeable organs. Like Zick’s ivory doll, Susini’s attractive Venus reclines against a white cloth, her hair curled. When the “lid” is closed, a string of pearls even adorns her neck.


Reclining female figure (“Medical Venus”)
Clemente Susini, late 18th century
La Specola, University of Florence

But unlike Zick’s ivory model, the Venus does not appear to be dead. Her eyes are open and her head is tilted in an attitude that has been variously described as drugged, ecstatic, resigned, or aroused. Other waxes at La Specola display similar expressions (see below). Although we find this apparent vivisection grotesque, the stuff of horror films, the 19th-century audience were probably more comfortable with such a surreal portrayal than they would have been with clinical realism. Reclining, drowsy nudes were common artistic subjects, and by giving his female nudes a classical, theatrical flourish, Susini may have been sidestepping the anxiety and taboos associated with dissection and violation of a corpse.

Reclining female figure
Clemente Susini, late 18th century
La Specola, University of Florence

A ceramic torso by Manfredini also selects a surreal mode of presentation. Manfredini’s subject actually holds the folds of her own dissected abdomen open, as the layers of her dermis drape and mingle visually with the cloth of her robe. Her face gazes upward thoughtfully, and her attitude seems to be calm, solicitous desire to help the viewer examine her viscera (including uterus, intestines, and two very accurate oviducts). One can almost imagine her tilting her pelvis to afford a better angle to the onlooker!


Female bust with open abdomen
Giovan-Battista Manfredini, 1773-76
terra cotta

These examples are part of a long tradition of placing anatomical specimens in “normal” social contexts; skeletons and partially flayed men are frequently depicted walking, posing, and conversing in illustration and sculpture. But male specimens were usually exhaustively dissected, which had a dehumanizing effect. Susini’s skinless, hairless male waxes at La Specola do not appear nearly as “alive” to us as his females, who served to demonstrate the few organs unique to their gender, and remained otherwise attractive and whole.

18th century obstetrical models represent women simultaneously as ideals of graceful femininity and as puzzle boxes of removable parts. The modern viewer may well find them bizarre; the detailed portrayal of their hair and jewelry seems irrelevant, incongruous, or macabre, and the overtones of vivisection are disturbing. In the words of my anatomy students, Rymsdyk’s unsentimental approach to anatomy is “gross” (literally), but Susini’s Medical Venus is “twisted.” Annette Burfoot, in a thought-provoking article that conveys the experience of visiting La Specola, calls the collection “a visual feast of gore and the erotic” and argues that the waxes are the earliest “‘cinematic’ representations of the body as liminal subject between fear and rationality—key components of the horror genre.”

As a society, we become uneasy whenever medical knowledge is taken out of a sterile, dehumanized context. Two recent traveling shows, “Body Worlds” and “Bodies: The Exhibition,” which use actual, plastinated cadavers in a variety of poses, have been predictably plagued by controversy. Bodies:The Exhibition has special problems with the provenance of its Chinese cadavers, but both shows have been criticized for turning anatomy into theatre, or treating human bodies as artistic raw material, to be posed and composed for dramatic effect. Body Worlds reportedly makes a special effort to avoid offending visitors with its one obstetric exhibit (a third-trimester female who voluntarily donated her body for this purpose) by moving it away from the rest, behind a curtain. Entertainment, education, or exploitation? One thing’s certain: anatomy and art remain awkward partners.


Dissecting Pregnancy in 18th-Century England, Lyle Massey

Clemente Susini’s wax anatomical models at the University of Cagliari

A very real art, Fiona Mattatall

Anatomical Venuses: the aesthetics of anatomical modelling in 18th- and 19th-century Europe, AW Bates

Spectacular Bodies, Martin Kemp and Marina Wallace

This entry was posted in Artists & Art, Biology, Museum Lust, Wonder Cabinets. Bookmark the permalink.

14 Responses to Wombs, Waxes and Wonder Cabinets

  1. Sciencesque says:

    What a great post! I’ve never seen anything like these, and would have never thought to look.

  2. Pingback: bioephemera.com » Pleistocene Skeleton

  3. Pingback: Club Troppo » Missing Link

  4. D says:

    The largest collection and some of the most wonderful and amazing of these creations (specifically Susini’s) are at the Josephinum in Vienna. Beautiful works of art.

  5. Pingback: bioephemera.com » Recent blog buzz on anatomical models

  6. Pingback: Club Troppo » Missing Link

  7. Pingback: Gamberi Fantasy » Blog Archive » Arte Noiosa

  8. Pingback: Resource updated: Molly Joyful's list of naval and historic resources « Joyful Molly

  9. sculptor says:

    Yucks…! what more can i say being an artist. This form of ceramic scultures was unimaginable to me before arriving at this page.

  10. Gadget says:

    What an interesting post! It was very informative and was still entertaining. A very nice job overall.

    This form of dissection is grossly intriguing! I had no problem looking at it and I was high interested, yet there was this small feeling of sickness in my gut. The works are very beautiful, but the idea of them being humans rather than mere corpses makes them terribly morbid. I should like to see these in person someday, if that’s possible.

    Thank you for this article!

  11. toaster917 says:

    A fascinating post. I just found your site, I plan to come back. Very interesting material and a nice level of sources/references.

  12. Pingback: Curious Expeditions » Blog Archive » Tickling the ivory baby

  13. artist-Tree says:

    A most interesting site to have come upon! The pregnancy model cabinet is just about one of the coolest things I’ve seen! Thanks for sharing such unique content!

  14. Melanie Chappelow says:

    Ive truely never seen a thing like it how incredibly ripperesque it is.don’t you think. ? Maybe a dr would love its weirdness….

Comments are closed.