Poem of the Week: We must risk delight

My favorite poem of 2005.

A Brief for the Defense
Jack Gilbert, Refusing Heaven

Sorrow everywhere. Slaughter everywhere. If babies
are not starving someplace, they are starving
somewhere else. With flies in their nostrils.
But we enjoy our lives because that’s what God wants.
Otherwise the mornings before summer dawn would not
be made so fine. The Bengal tiger would not
be fashioned so miraculously well. The poor women
at the fountain are laughing together between
the suffering they have known and the awfulness
in their future, smiling and laughing while somebody
in the village is very sick. There is laughter
every day in the terrible streets of Calcutta,
and the women laugh in the cages of Bombay.
If we deny our happiness, resist our satisfaction,
we lessen the importance of their deprivation.
We must risk delight. We can do without pleasure,
but not delight. Not enjoyment. We must have
the stubbornness to accept our gladness in the ruthless
furnace of this world. To make injustice the only
measure of our attention is to praise the Devil.
If the locomotive of the Lord runs us down,
we should give thanks that the end had magnitude.
We must admit there will be music despite everything.
We stand at the prow again of a small ship
anchored late at night in the tiny port
looking over to the sleeping island: the waterfront
is three shuttered cafés and one naked light burning.
To hear the faint sound of oars in the silence as a rowboat
comes slowly out and then goes back is truly worth
all the years of sorrow that are to come.

NPR interviews Jack Gilbert, and he reads the first half of this poem, here: “What a wonderful privilege, to be allowed to breathe. To see. To feel. To smell. To love. It’s baffling, the sweetness of what we’re allowed.”

Posted in Poetry | Comments Off

Galactopod (I pay an art debt)

galactopod1.jpg

Galactopod
2007
Watercolor on Winsor & Newton Paper

My friend Seth and I have been mailing art back and forth for years. I don’t remember how it got started, but in the past year or two, I’m pretty sure he’s sent me art three or four times with no reciprocation. I’m a bad art friend. To make it up to him, I had to do something dramatic. And what’s more dramatic than a gigantic, vaguely alien-ish cephalopod brooding in the inky blackness of space?

Posted in Cephalopodmania, My Artwork | 2 Comments

A-musing (and surprisingly accurate) quiz

If only being a bookish tease was a job qualification.

You scored as Clio. You are Clio, the muse of history. You love academic pursuits, but still know to have fun. You’re a bit of a tease and a prankster.

Which of the Greek Muses are you?
created with QuizFarm.com

Posted in Frivolity | 1 Comment

A leaf on the family tree

BDAN.8643.lg.jpg
Study for Transmission no. 3
Binh Danh, 2006
leaf preserved in resin
Haines Gallery

A timely post from Sciencesque identifies two artists, the late Axel Erlandson and Binh Danh, whose medium is living plant material.

Binh Danh’s leaf prints are direct conceptual descendents of Anna Atkins’ photograms, but rely on the living leaf’s natural pigmentation process to “fix” the image. I like the way his work nests human geneology inside plant geneology – Study for Transmission no. 3 is like a branch from a living family tree.

Via Sciencesque from easternblot.net from Complex medium. (Don’t you love how blog posts form little geneologies too?)

Posted in Artists & Art, Biology, Photography | Comments Off

The Gret Quizz of Medievale Trivia

I haven’t posted nearly enough procrastinatory quizzes lately – so here’s one from Geoffrey Chaucer, especially for my dear friend mdvlist.

Everyone else, I warn you, it’s hard. I haven’t done this badly on a quiz since calculus I!

Posted in Frivolity, Littademia | 2 Comments

Deep Blue Seaweed

235Bx.jpg
Anna Atkins
Dictyota dichotoma
cyanotype
from Photographs of British Algae, 1843-1853

Like many women in science of previous centuries, Anna Atkins (1799-1871) had the immense advantage of an educated father. John George Children was a prominent scientist and member of the Royal Society, and Atkins grew up in a house with a fully equipped laboratory. Continue reading

Posted in Artists & Art, Biology, Photography | 1 Comment

Anxious Influence

Hungry Hyaena has a thoughtful post on plagiarism, intellectual property, and the artist’s perspective on information saturation:

Artists are turning to the symbolic and the approximate in an effort to render experience comprehensible. Certainly this is an important, even vital process but it amounts to reductionism and, as such, there is some risk involved. What’s lost in an abridged reality?

Plagiarism, an issue both practical and philosophical, polarizes the art community. Copyright protects artists who support themselves by marketing exclusive reproductions of their work. Such artists are becoming increasingly vocal in defense of their rights

On the other hand, art is a tradition of responding to, appropriating, and reimagining visual influences. How unlike its inspiration must a painting be, to be “original?” What about references? Collage? Warhol and Lichtenstein? Fan art? In a modern context, what exactly is plagiarism?

Posted in Artists & Art | Comments Off

Tell me again how great I am

Wouldn’t it be nice if you could just buy some favorable peer reviews for your latest paper? In the world of vanity self-publishing, Slate reports, you can not only buy praise, you can suggest improvements to your review.

Here’s what booksurge.com promises for only $399:

Give your book instant credibility and attention with a book review by New York Times bestselling author, Ellen Tanner Marsh. . . From this marketing-style review, you can pull the most descriptive and alluring quote and place it on the back cover of your book and any other marketing materials you create.

Mmmm, descriptive and alluring. I wonder if she reviews blogs?

Update: Microsoft is now getting a hard time for buying reviews, too – although in this case, the reviews were to be part of Wikipedia entries. Ouch. To be fair, the blogger asked to edit the entries was an outside expert, not a Microsoft employee, and everyone knows Wikipedia is (unfortunately) rife with nonobjectivity. But that doesn’t make it ok. There is an implicit expectation of partisanship when a review is paid for. (Booksurge simply made those expectations explicit).

If the Microsoft whiz who thought this up had ever been involved in the scientific peer review process, including the extensive (but likely insufficient) precautions meant to prevent the backers of a study from exerting undue influence on the outcome, the problem should have been obvious. Perfect objectivity may be a chimera, but in science, its pursuit is required.

Posted in Books | Comments Off

Legos rule

If I had to make a choice between Macs and Legos as commercial objects of devotion, I think my head would explode. I adore my Mac, I love my iPod, but as a child, Legos were my life. Even now, I still envision simple math problems as stacks of onesies, twosies, and sixers.

I always had suspicions that they’d turned me a little “science-y.” Now I have proof of their technological agenda! Check out their latest ad:

lego_table.jpg

Hat-tip: Inky Circus

Update: On reflection, this might make an even better Lego ad:

octopus_and_lego.jpg

hat-tip: Pharyngula

Posted in Cephalopodmania, Frivolity, Science | Comments Off

The Ironic Workout: five muscles at once!

artnat.jpg

This is a screenshot from a wonderful anatomy learning tool, Artnatomy, by artist and educator Victoria Contreras Flores. It’s meant to teach facial anatomy in a Fine Arts context, but would work equally well in an introductory A&P course.

Teaching the facial muscles is a pain because they’re so small – you can’t really see them on a cat. On the human cadaver, they resemble thin sheets of jerky (well, they do! Sorry!) Plus, unlike the uncomplicated bicep, they function in some very complex facial expressions. Artnatomy shows you which muscles contribute to express an emotion like “irony” (above), which makes it much easier to remember each muscle’s position and function.

If you have a minute, though, check out the simulation of “pleasure.” There’s something a little odd about that one. At least to me.

Hat-tip: Tania Rabesandratana at Inkling

Posted in Artists & Art, Biology, Education, Science | 1 Comment