Poem of the Week: let’s hear it for descent with variations

Let’s be honest: biologists sometimes get a little intoxicated by the beauty of the natural world. My friends know I will break off mid-conversation to crawl into the brush, mesmerized by a snake or a liverwort. My good china is full of dead insects, and my freezer is packed with unlucky birds. I collect things. To be surrounded by those wonders on a daily basis, to unpack and unravel and discover them, is to be constantly at play. Becoming a biologist is the perfect excuse to never grow up.

My favorite “biology poem,” by Atlantic Monthly poetry editor David Barber, perfectly captures that playful wonder. It’s from his latest, phenomenally diverse book, fittingly titled Wonder Cabinet. I’ve been carrying it with me all winter, and can’t recommend it highly enough. This book is a real Wonder Cabinet.

Pam at Phantasmaphile recently noted the unfortunate proliferation of self-declared “Wonder Cabinets” that are basically random juxtapositions of objects. The original wonder cabinets (or wunderkammeren, or cabinets of curiosities), were somewhat haphazard – they predated modern scientific taxonomies, freely mixing natural specimens with artificial objects of interest; their contents reflected the eccentric tastes of individual collectors. But above all, a wonder cabinet was the world in microcosm: what Francis Bacon described as “a small compass, a model of the universe made private.” They weren’t just accumulated stuff; they were windows into unprecedented geographic and scientific vistas. Today, it’s difficult to imagine the awe an authentic wonder cabinet must have evoked. Many scientists disapproved of wunderkammer fever: according to Descartes, “What we commonly call being astonished is an excess of wonder that can never be otherwise than bad.”

Descartes, for all his contributions to neuroscience, was clearly not my kind of biologist. Biology is all about excess – often quite messy excess. Wonder cabinets were just loosely edited selections from the excessive complexity of Nature. Furthermore, a cabinet provoked novel connections between collected artifacts and the remembered artifacts of the viewer’s experience. Within a wonder cabinet, there’s no single, prescribed path of analysis, but an excess of intuitive possibilities. It’s a cabinet of curiosity, a cabinet of questions, not answers. And that’s also very close to my personal definition of a successful poem.

To make sense of the unfamiliar, the astonishing, the messy, we resort to history and language; definitions and names; systems of organizing and explaining the evidence before us. In Wonder Cabinet, David Barber considers all of these things: excess of wonder (“Thumbnail Sketch of the Tulipmania”), the personal wonder that moves the scientist (“Ode to William Wells”), wonderful names (“Chimerical”, “Aphrodite’s Mousetrap”). It’s a pleasure to see my own inarticulate instincts about the delight and wonder of biology expressed so well. It would be a guilty pleasure, if it weren’t such good poetry.

“Pilgrim’s Progress”
David Barber, Wonder Cabinet

The fin is the finest thing of its kind.
The wing’s a wonder the world over.
The tongue is a form of eternal flame.
The stone’s a story that never grows old.

O fin, it’s certain you want for nothing.
Yo wing, you’re everything we’ve ever dreamed.
You said it, tongue: of arms and men you sing.
Here’s looking at you, stone: a star is born.

Who doesn’t burn for a soul on the wing?
Where is the man that can fine-tune the fin?
When shall we learn to read the mind of the stone?
What in the world holds its own like the tongue?

Stone says fin’s the one that schooled the wing.
Story goes one singer could charm the stones.
Rock, paper, scissors; worlds without end.
One slip of the tongue makes the whole world kin.

All together now: the many in the one.
Brush fire of fins stirring the fathoms,
Cairns of lost tongues, the chorus in the wings
Riffing on the omens of the heavens.

Soul knows it can’t live on breath alone.
When the tongue wags the dog, the fur’s gonna fly.
The stone is a kind of recording angel.
The wing’s got the beat. The fin makes waves.

Wing it, mother tongue: the world’s your whetstone.
We’re wired for sound. We’re unfinished business.
Let’s hear it for the phoenix, all fired up.
Sirens, rock us to sleep with the fishes.

Let’s hear it for descent with variations.
Let him without fin go back to the grindstone.
The bat is the manta ray’s soul brother.
The dolphin’s glossolalia speaks volumes.

Hosannas for sea changes, the wish made flesh.
As the silkworm turns, as the chrysalis
Is my witness, leviathan’s no fluke.
Blood from a stone is a thing to behold.

Blow me down with a feather, fishers of men;
Rock of ages, take me under your wing.
Muse, make it new: leave no tongue untuned.
Rock my world, winged gods: begin again.

Atlantic Monthly interview with David Barber (if you are a subscriber, this poem is available as an audio file on their site)

Cruelest Month interview with David Barber

Other poems from Wonder Cabinet: “Shades of Alexandria” and “To the Trespasser”

Many thanks to David Barber for granting permission to share this poem with my readers.

Posted in Biology, Books, Poetry, Science, Wonder Cabinets | 3 Comments

Now, that’s meritorious

Science scouts: much better than plain old girl scouts!

badges.jpg

Is it scary that I would qualify for so many merit badges? Actually, I could invent a few more, such as “I have administered illegal drugs of abuse to insects,” but then I’d be giving away all my Science Secrets. (See the link for the meaning of these badges).
Note that there is also one for, well, cephalopodmania (although I am not yet worthy):
27invertebrate.jpg

From the good folks at SCQ.

Posted in Biology, Cephalopodmania, Frivolity, Science | 2 Comments

A tree of life? More like wildflowers

tolyell.jpg

Phylogenetic Tree Visualization

I don’t really understand how this representation was created, beyond the involvement of a Walrus; but it’s amazing. According to the source:

This picture is a visualisation of the entire tree of life. The tree of life (cellular organisms) has three main branches:
• The bacteria (unicellular prokaryotic microorganisms) which are in focus in this picture and represented by orange nodes.
• The archaea which are probably more closely related to the eukaryotes than they are to the bacteria even though they lack a cell nucleus and represent some of the most extreme forms of life on earth. They are represented by red nodes and near the top and in the background of the picture
• The eukarya (all cellular organisms with a cell nucleus) represented by yellow nodes and are located on the left hand side and in the background of the picture.

Via grrlscientist.

Posted in Biology, Science | Comments Off

Don’t tell your psychiatrist

blot4.jpg
Inkblot #4
Jason Krieger

Rorschach blots are controversial diagnostic tools. But I’m digging these digital ink blots by Jason Krieger, editor of Phirebrush. If you think you see cow skulls or dead birds in these blots, that’s because there are. Though I still wouldn’t tell your psychiatrist.

inkblot05.jpg
Inkblot #5
Jason Kreiger

Posted in Artists & Art | 2 Comments

A little reading is a dangerous thing

I’ve been reading more than posting for the past week, and have a collection of odds, ends and lint to pass on.

I have a love/hate relationship with the New Yorker. It’s just too much reading for me to keep up with. I have stacks of New Yorkers dating back to 2003 that I’m trying to absorb and throw out; meanwhile the onslaught of new issues continues. But once in a while an issue like that of Feb. 12 arrives, and I remember why it’s worth the guilt (and magazine-strewn living room). Larissa MacFarquhar’s profile of philosophers Paul and Patricia Churchland not only dwelt at length on one of my favorite topics, the mind-body problem, it was also the sweetest academic Valentine’s tale. As I recounted to one of my friends, “they work together, they publish together, and they’ve been married forty years. I didn’t know that was possible.” (I have more than one acquaintance who refused to date within her field, because the job prospects for similar pairs dwindle to near-nothing). The Churchland profile was followed by a lovely little fable from Primo Levi which revisits similar themes of language and consciousness and the arcane rituals of scientist families. It couldn’t have been a happier pairing. And then the next article was on Alfred Wallace. I love you, New Yorker. At least today I do.
Continue reading

Posted in Biology, Frivolity, Poetry, Science, Science in culture & policy | 1 Comment

Rebekka Guðleifsdóttir

scenery0165.jpg

Núpstaðir
Rebekka Guðleifsdóttir

I ought to spend more time on flickr. I thought I was so clever to discover photographer Rebekka Guðleifsdóttir, when it turns out she is a flickr superstar with a Prius campaign behind her. You go, girl.

In these photos, Iceland appears a lot like my idea of New Zealand – a jewel-toned, rugged paradise, grandly epic, yet solidly earthed in the matter-of-fact. Perfect for hobbits and elves. If it actually is that way, I want to visit.

fairy.jpg

Fairy Tale
Rebekka Guðleifsdóttir

Posted in Artists & Art, Photography | 2 Comments

Oh look – it’s me

philoxkcd.png

Thank you to my long-suffering friends, who have needed the metaphorical SuperSoaker increasingly frequently. I’ll try to limit my obsessive introspection, I promise.
I heart xkcd.

Posted in Department of the Drama, Frivolity | Comments Off

My new running partner

Today I was joined on my daily riverside run by a bald eagle. Every time I passed him and got just out of sight, he flew directly over my head to a new perch up ahead. We played this leapfrog game for about two miles. I have never before wished so keenly that my iPod was also a digital camera.

I thought it was rather odd that the squirrels and seagulls didn’t seem fazed by him whatsoever. On the other hand, judging by the piles of feathers I passed coming back to my car, I think he was full.

I’m going to miss these runs so much when I move.

Posted in Frivolity | 2 Comments

Another da Vinci Mystery

battleanghiarirubens.jpg
The Battle of Anghiari
Chalk, ink, watercolor
Anonymous and Peter Paul Rubens, after a lost mural by Leonardo da Vinci

Way cooler than the Da Vinci Code: an ex-bioengineer is trying to find a lost Da Vinci painting behind an Italian wall.

What makes it plausible: the painting definitely existed on a wall in the palace five hundred years ago. The artist who supposedly painted over it, Vasari, wrote of Leonardo:

Occasionally, in a way that transcends nature, a single person is marvellously endowed by Heaven with beauty, grace and talent in such abundance that he leaves other men far behind, all his actions seem inspired and indeed everything he does clearly comes from God rather than from human skill. Everyone acknowledged that this was true of Leonardo da Vinci. (Vasari, Lives of the Artists).

Could the man who wrote that really have destroyed a work by Leonardo?

What makes it less likely: Leo, ever the experimentalist, tried to use an encaustic technique which failed spectacularly, leaving large sections of the unfinished painting in ruins. Was there even anything remaining for Vasari to preserve?

NYT article
AP article

Zoom in to explore the amazing details of armor and anatomy in Rubens’ copy.

Posted in Artists & Art | 1 Comment

Poem of the Week: For all this, nature is never spent

Poor Gerard Manley Hopkins. He’s frequently anthologized, yet I get the feeling people read his poems and go “Wha. . . .?”

So he was a manic-depressive repressed Jesuit who invented his own words, rhythm and poetic theory. So his overt religious agenda can be a bit preachy. If you get through that, his poems are refreshingly short, sweet, and downright fun to recite.

Yesterday’s talk of birds got me thinking of this Hopkins poem, which must take the prize for most over-the-top poetic bird metaphor (unless his “Windhover” did first). I memorized it almost ten years ago, and still remember the whole thing. Ah, the mnemonic power of sprung rhythm and alliteration. Definitely read this one aloud.

(And let’s hope he was right that “nature is never spent” – because our species is pushing it.)

God’s Grandeur
Gerard Manley Hopkins

The world is charged with the grandeur of God.
It will flame out, like shining from shook foil;
It gathers to a greatness, like the ooze of oil
Crushed. Why do men then now not reck his rod?
Generations have trod, have trod, have trod;
And all is seared with trade; bleared, smeared with toil;
And wears man’s smudge and shares man’s smell: the soil
Is bare now, nor can foot feel, being shod.

And for all this, nature is never spent;
There lives the dearest freshness deep down things;
And though the last lights off the black West went
Oh, morning, at the brown brink eastward, springs—
Because the Holy Ghost over the bent
World broods with warm breast and with ah! bright wings.

Posted in Poetry | 2 Comments