Looking to Remember

Cognitive Daily: Artists look different

Cognitive Daily alerts us to a study quantifying the different visual scanning techniques used by artists and non-artists. Here’s a figure from the study, tracking eye movements in yellow:

vart2.jpg

The trained artist (right) looks at more of the entire picture, while the non-artist (left) focuses on “key areas” – in this case, the swimmer, but similar results were obtained for non-human “key areas”. (The non-artist control group were psychologists – also highly trained to study and retain information).

If you have artistic training (including self-guided training), you may have noticed this shift in your own observational techniques. An artist considers the scene as a whole: focusing on the subject in relationship to its context, rather than in isolation. I especially appreciate the way the artist’s eyes follow the rhythm of the waves diagonally across the painting – identifying and enacting an important compositional pattern that the non-artist appears to completely ignore.

The jerky, flyaway eye movements of the nonartists, which seem to repeatedly slide right off the image, are not a surprise either. Artists plan for those effects when composing a work, carefully guiding the imagined viewer’s eyes within the painting’s field. A standard rule of thumb is to avoid a strong, unbalanced line, or any object ending right at the border of the composition, because they tend to draw the onlooker’s eye irrevocably off the edge of the artwork (sort of like a ship falling off a flat Earth).

Continue reading

Posted in Artists & Art, Biology | 4 Comments

Poem of the Week: Mnemonic

Apparently you can selectively wipe out a single memory in rats. If you believe that our memories make us who we are, the implications are disturbing. I joke about wanting to block out portions of my life – usually chunks of grad school – but if we forget our mistakes, are we doomed to repeat them?

This poem by Li-Young Lee captures an even more elusive aspect of memory: how the habit of remembering, or trying to recapture a failing memory, becomes an act of self-definition. We are who we remember ourselves to be.

Mnemonic
Li-Young Lee, Rose

I was tired. So I lay down.
My lids grew heavy. So I slept.
Slender memory, stay with me.

I was cold once. So my father took off his blue sweater.
He wrapped me in it, and I never gave it back.
It is the sweater he wore to America,
this one, which I’ve grown into, whose sleeves are too long.
Flamboyant blue in daylight, poor blue by daylight,
it is black in the folds.

A serious man who devised complex systems of numbers and rhymes
to aid him in remembering, a man who forgot nothing, my father
would be ashamed of me.
Not because I’m forgetful,
but because there is no order
to my memory, a heap
of details, uncatalogued, illogical.
For instance:
God was lonely. So he made me.
My father loved me. so he spanked me.
It hurt him to do so. He did it daily.

The earth is flat. Those who fall off don’t return.
The earth is round. All things reveal themselves to men only gradually.

It won’t last. Memory is sweet.
Even when it’s painful, memory is sweet.

Once I was cold. So my father took off his blue sweater.

A collection of Li-Young Lee links

Posted in Poetry | 1 Comment

Vampire Hunting, Victorian-Style

kit.jpg

A vampire-hunting kit, from Thomas Sandberg’s Wonder Cabinet:

An incredible Victorian novelty. Complete in mahogany box with revolver, silver bullets, garlic powder, silver dagger, ivory cross, mirror, Professor Blomberg`s New Vampire Serum, wooden stake, etc.

Fortunately, Clive Thompson assures us there can’t be more than 512 vampyric bloodsuckers running around at the moment. It’s ecologically implausible. (Although the population model makes debatable assumptions about vampyric reproduction – a topic on which Whedon, Rice, Stoker, le Fanu, etc. don’t agree).

The Sandberg collection is extensive. There are papier-mache anatomical models, medicine boxes, even a clockwork lion that jumps and roars. I want!

hat-tip: Athanasius Kircher Society

Posted in Museum Lust, Wonder Cabinets | 3 Comments

I just hope it’s not mad

lrg_robot_cow.jpg

from Modern Mechanix

Which incidentally reminds me of . . .
cowfigure.gif

Posted in Frivolity, Uncategorized | Comments Off

So I’m a liberal-arts-educated scientist. So what?

This cartoon makes me happy and nostalgic. Yes, I know I’m weird. Happy Pi Day.

2007-03-04.JPG

Saint Gasoline » Archive » The Allegory of the Trolley Problem Paradox

Posted in Frivolity | 1 Comment

Buy yourself a “Cabinet of Curiosities”

0500510911.01._SS500_SCLZZZZZZZ_.jpg

I can’t justify purchasing all the expensive science and art books I really want, so they languish on my Amazon wishlist forever. A case in point would be Patrick Mauries’s Cabinets of Curiosities, an oversized hardbound book with lots of yummy full color pictures. The Amazon price hovers around $47 (the price on the jacket is $75). I hadn’t seen it, even used, for less than $30. Too spendy.

I recently got an email promoting a new comparison shopping website, Booksprice.com, so I tested it out on the Mauries book. The result? DeepDiscount.com currently has it for $12 with free shipping! I was suspicious, so I ordered it (I can usually justify spending $12) and it arrived completely shrink-wrapped, in perfect condition. If you also like wonder cabinets, it would be a very pretty (and now affordable) addition to your collection – although somewhat light on scholarship.

Incidentally, Booksprice lets you import your Amazon wishlist and save it, which is a very useful feature. It’s also refreshingly uncluttered with ads, even aesthetically pleasing, as third-party comparison shopping sites go. So you might consider trying it on your own wishlist. I didn’t get any more results as dramatic as the Mauries book, but I’m going to keep checking.

Posted in Books, Wonder Cabinets | 1 Comment

Flowers and Fossils

struthiomimusa.jpg

Struthiomimus and Tulip
oil on panel
David Dodge Lewis, Evolution Series

A series of still life paintings playing on the relationship between fossils and modern organisms, and featuring especially well-rendered flowers. The show opens March 28 at the Atkinson Museum, Hampden-Sydney College, Virginia (where David Dodge Lewis is Professor of Fine Arts), in conjunction with a four-day Biology Symposium.

The Evolution Series treats a topic fundamental to our understanding of life. It does so by celebrating fossils, the most important empirical evidence for evolution. Since fossils are often of bones, the paintings are eulogies, and the inclusion of flowers both emphasizes the fragile brevity of life and connects to present day rituals, like flowers at a memorial service.

– David Dodge Lewis

Posted in Artists & Art, Biology, Science | 2 Comments

Top 50 SF/F Booklist

This list is going around the science blogosphere. It seems de rigueur to comment on the choices and mark the ones you’ve read. This is a book meme I can support – although I was surprised I’d missed so many. I thought I was fairly well read in these genres.
Continue reading

Posted in Books | 1 Comment

Cloning with a dicot accent: a biologist’s take on linguistic inconsistency

Language Log: Foolish Hobgoblins

It’s been many long years since I was an English major. That’s my standard justification when I get sloppy and split some infinitives, or use “which” when I ought to write “that.” I put punctuation inside and outside of quotation marks as it suits me, and use British spellings on a whim. As long as my meaning is clear, and it doesn’t violate my aesthetic sense, I just don’t feel strongly about consistency. This Language Log post summarizes my attitudes pretty well. It’s a relief to hear from such a qualified source that I’m not completely alone in my negligence.

I’ve wondered if some of my linguistic laxity derives from my science training – not only through lack of writing practice, but through an elevated tolerance for uncertainty. In science, there is no conclusively “right” answer. You always consider several possible models, and although eventually experimentation narrows these possibilities down, in the meantime you must respect them all. In short, in the absence of good evidence, you shouldn’t arbitrarily prioritize one hypothesis over another. I feel the same way about language. When the meaning is plain, and several alternatives are used by equally good writers (whether from different historical periods, different countries, or different academic cultures – the Language Log post gives a number of good examples) I don’t feel there’s good reason to prioritize one usage over another.

In genetics, you learn to look past variation that isn’t relevant to the issue under investigation. Every gene exists in multiple versions, or alleles, but only some of those alleles have significantly altered functions. The rest are pretty much equivalent. The RNA codons GCA and GCG both encode alanine, so I don’t particularly care which is used in a gene, because I get the same protein either way. It’s like a regional variation in pronunciation: if we all understand what’s meant, why nitpick?

Continue reading

Posted in Biology, Words | 4 Comments

Happy Birthday PZ!

pzbday.jpg

my apologies for the lateness of this post – although it is still Friday here on the West Coast. I’ve been without a computer most of this week, but I had to post SOMETHING for PZ Myers‘ birthday. So I’ve mashed up two of his favorite things: Charles Darwin and a cephalopod. I hope you had a wonderful day, PZ, and thanks for all the inspiration!

Posted in Cephalopodmania, Frivolity | Comments Off