<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is this art? (part 2)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bioephemera.com/2007/06/12/is-this-art-part-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bioephemera.com/2007/06/12/is-this-art-part-2/</link>
	<description>the art of biology &#38; the biology of art</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 19:53:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Monado</title>
		<link>http://bioephemera.com/2007/06/12/is-this-art-part-2/#comment-10992</link>
		<dc:creator>Monado</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 16:02:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bioephemera.com/2007/06/12/is-this-art-part-2/#comment-10992</guid>
		<description>It reminds me of some photomicrographs of pollen that I&#039;ve seen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It reminds me of some photomicrographs of pollen that I&#8217;ve seen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

