<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Not Pleistocene, Not a Skeleton</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bioephemera.com/2007/03/02/pleistocene-skeleton/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bioephemera.com/2007/03/02/pleistocene-skeleton/</link>
	<description>the art of biology &#38; the biology of art</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 19:53:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: cicada</title>
		<link>http://bioephemera.com/2007/03/02/pleistocene-skeleton/#comment-1989</link>
		<dc:creator>cicada</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 18:51:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bioephemera.com/2007/03/02/pleistocene-skeleton/#comment-1989</guid>
		<description>Zeladoniac: I agree - I think the skeleton is a bit more convincing than the fully realized camel. I&#039;m not sure if the purpose was to be convincingly real, or just disturbingly close. But it&#039;s certainly cool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zeladoniac: I agree &#8211; I think the skeleton is a bit more convincing than the fully realized camel. I&#8217;m not sure if the purpose was to be convincingly real, or just disturbingly close. But it&#8217;s certainly cool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zeladoniac</title>
		<link>http://bioephemera.com/2007/03/02/pleistocene-skeleton/#comment-1808</link>
		<dc:creator>zeladoniac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 13:49:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bioephemera.com/2007/03/02/pleistocene-skeleton/#comment-1808</guid>
		<description>It would be interesting to see a reconstruction. It appears to be a camel designed by committee. Cool work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be interesting to see a reconstruction. It appears to be a camel designed by committee. Cool work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lawgeek</title>
		<link>http://bioephemera.com/2007/03/02/pleistocene-skeleton/#comment-1663</link>
		<dc:creator>Lawgeek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 16:25:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bioephemera.com/2007/03/02/pleistocene-skeleton/#comment-1663</guid>
		<description>Wow.. great post.  And so well researched!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow.. great post.  And so well researched!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sunil Gangadharan</title>
		<link>http://bioephemera.com/2007/03/02/pleistocene-skeleton/#comment-1660</link>
		<dc:creator>Sunil Gangadharan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 14:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bioephemera.com/2007/03/02/pleistocene-skeleton/#comment-1660</guid>
		<description>Sometimes looking back at an artist’s oeuvre brings forth so much more new information and hidden nuances. Glad you wrote this piece on Miss Nancy Graves. We will be sure to check out her art on our next visit to the Smithsonian...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes looking back at an artist’s oeuvre brings forth so much more new information and hidden nuances. Glad you wrote this piece on Miss Nancy Graves. We will be sure to check out her art on our next visit to the Smithsonian&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

